'Ethics Case Study: Homeless Man Essay\r'

'Case Facts:\r\nWe decided to talk over the case of the stateless macrocosmhood provided in the textbook. Here are the case facts: A stateless man attempted to palliate a woman that was be attacked in New York City. In the process he was stabbed. He was visibly bleeding on the sidewalk for over an hour, as multitude walked by, took pictures and stopped to look at him. unrivaled man shook him. No ane attempted to help him, puzzle with him, or call emergency services. The homeless person man died on the sidewalk.\r\nObligations, Duties and Rights:\r\nAfter reading the initial facts of the case, we discussed the liabilitys, duties and salubrious(p)s all held by the passersby and viewers of the situation. They are as follows: Every genus Passer has the right to their personal guard and health, as well as the right to remain slow and anonymous. Given these undeniable rights, every passerby as well has the incorrupt duty and obligation to report a witnessed crime to the authorities. They also put one across the duty to work towards maintaining the safety and well-being of their community. Along with this duty, comes to obligation to choke and protect the close to vulnerable among this community.\r\nConsequences:\r\nOur host further discussed the implications of the situation and the associated consequences, both mean and unintended, imperious and negative. Following are the consequences that could soak up occurred if the passersby had chosen to offer aid to the homeless man: First, the man’s life sentence could have been relieve. some other outcome would be the finding and persecution of the abominable.\r\nAnother, would be setting a positive example for the community, in chip promoting the safety of the community as a whole. Another positive consequence could be acting as a catalyst for future laws to be enacted aiding the community. Finally, a positive outcome from helping the homeless man would leave the passersby with altru istic emotions.\r\nNegative consequences that could dissolver from refusing to aid the homeless man would hold: The homeless man dies and the criminal escapes, potentially continuing to harm more members of the community. Another consequence includes the public losing a wiz of security as well as the passersby having the uneasiness and uncertainty of not intimate the outcome of the situation if they chose to walk by before his death. Finally, if the passerby chose to walk a right smart, they case the negative consequence of feeling of distress upon denying their personal morals and obligations.\r\nMoral Ideals:\r\nHaving study the facts, obligations and consequences of the case, the moral nonesuchs that we have extrapolated are: Justice, integrity, pleasing kindness, and courage. Justice, â€Å"denoting the evaluation of situations according to their merits, fairly and without prejudice, as well as giving for each one person his or her due.” The high hat way to ca rry out justice in this situation would have been to ensure that the criminal was found and prosecuted, and protecting the life of the homeless man. Integrity, the quality of being honest and having safe moral principles regardless of who is watching, is the second moral principle that we have decided best relates to this case.\r\nIf the passerby had acted with integrity, he/she would have opted to stay with or somehow help the homeless man to insure that his life was remedyd as opposed to denying their moral obligation in walking away and choosing to slew the situation. The next moral principle is winning kindness, â€Å"doing unto others as you would have them do unto you,” or simply the Golden Rule. If the passersby had showed loving kindness, they would have felt empathy towards the homeless man as a fellow human being and would have ensured that he received aid, as they would have wished someone do for them if their roles were reversed.\r\nThe net moral apotheosis that we felt most applied to this case was courage, â€Å"consisting only in conquering fear and in withholding the body from flight no result what the risk of pain. We felt that this moral ideal applied to the case, as it would require the passersby to swerve their rights to safety as humans and leave alone their obligations to aid the man override their sand of fear and insecurity. If the passerby had maintained this ideal of courage, they would have approached the homeless man and helped to save his life.\r\n'