The diversity of religions is another argument

Personally, I find the Halls principles convincing, maybe beca expenditure they are consistent with my previous experience. My opinion is that science is a more reliable elbow room of exploring the piece. Its advantage is that there is only one science with the scientific method acting universally recognized in all or most part of the globe, whereas the marginalization of different parts of society often occurs because there are different religions and people follow different views.The diversity of religions is another argument why science as a universal world mindset should take precedence before it.The scientific method seems to be a far more reliable method of exploring the world. It is based on observations, not some obscure revelations of prophets and messengers from God, and the scientist is dribbleed to be thorough and honest in documenting the appearcomes of the experiment. Of course, there is also room for the construction of hypotheses that come arbitrarily out of somebodys mind, but these prolong to be substantiated with factual severalise in order to become valid knowledge.Presupposition of the existence of some mixture of transnatural forces will inevitably mar the investigation of scientific facts because it leaves as well as a good deal space to issues that arbitrarily affect the results of the investigation. Some people give the axe aim to the scientific method because they think it will leave the world precise dry and boring.People have to understand that this mystical view of the world buttocks leave it unexplored because consideration of issuers irrelevant to the process will have to become part of it.2. The es utter by Edwin A. Locke does include ideas that merit attention. However, it sizeables too supremacist with regard to other nations.The problem with identifying the success of the West with its more sound political theory lies in the fact that it many factors contributed to the prominence of the West. Some would say that it simply managed to rise ahead of other res publicas, suppressing them with colonialist policies. That other nations did not compact technology often means that they had poor access to it.Robert Wright in his hear takes a different viewpoint. He critically assesses the notion of manifest hazard for America that supports the idea of its greatness. Besides, he advocates that ethnocentrism is actually wrong for America because it conflicts with multiculturalism that permits unruffled coexistence of all people in the same land. International relations smoke also profit if American stop asserting their superiority and ferment a more open eye toward other nations.3. Lukacs believed that the dominate ideology of the 20th century was nationalism. Alliance between people on the stem of nations proved to be more powerful than affinity that was based on class as the one assumed Marxists.Lukacs argues that people were swept by nationalist feelings that outstripped other ideologic al quirks such as Communism. The Cold warfare was, in the opinion of Lukacs, protracted because of the persisting anti-Communism embraced by many in the West. In Lukacs view, this is a spontaneous, often irrational feeling that surfaces only at bottom the bourgeoisie, but also among workers themselves.The main reason for its existence is the desire of respectability. His criticisms can also be applied to anti-terrorism rampant today, a feeling that also leads to oversimplification and overstatement of the challenge for example, manifested in the proneness to blame the substantial Muslim world for the acts.The author identifies problems with the dissolution of the empires with the rise of nationalist feelings in these areas, spurred on by masses and desire of local finishicials to become leaders of new states.Nationalistic feelings also fuel wars for independence that occurred in the colonial world in the 20th century where the people sought to throw off the yoke of foreign power s, not necessarily for the benefit of their own nation. The state in Lucacs perception is the political entity that is formally constructed for instance, the Soviet state was reign by one party. The nation, on the other hand, is more easily distinctive with people.4. Fundamentalism is going to be one of the key issues that dominate American politics and the national policy-making worldwide. It represents the trend to address religious texts for guidance on all historic events, a road map to success and an undefiled prediction of future events if humans study it correctly.This tradition leads people to interpret modern history in apocalyptic terms, viewing the world as a battlefield between the Christ and the Anti-Christ. This can lead to the contestation to discard all technological innovations because the Satan is expected to make use of them in order to take control of the earth. Moreover, people will expect the second coming of the Christ.